Reputation:
0
Thanks Given: 0
Thanks Received: 0 (0 Posts)
Posts:
4
Threads:
1
Joined: Oct 2015
I have a mini R53 in my shop at the moment and we are looking to make some mild changes to the map to hopefully get it running a little closer to normal.
On reading the file a few weeks ago i noticed that the file would have some changes at the beginning every time the ecu was read out , sometimes there are quite a few changes and sometimes they are closer to each other. Having not been near a mini before i am hesitant to load a file on with these changes taking place. Hoping someone can enlighten me a little on if i should be worrying so much as i cant seem to find any information on this subject on here ( feel free to point me to a thread if i'm being stupid ! )
The car in question Is a JCW variant from 2004 , the last 4 reads we made of the car are attached to this thread. Any help would be greatly appreciated, we have the car now mechanically sound so it would be nice to get on top of the tune too
Thanks given by:
Reputation:
150
Thanks Given: 193
Thanks Received: 643 (459 Posts)
Posts:
1,332
Threads:
33
Joined: Jan 2015
Post ecu type.
If is a siemens it haven't eeprom so use flash for live data, and is normal that every readed file is different.
Thanks given by:
Reputation:
0
Thanks Given: 0
Thanks Received: 0 (0 Posts)
Posts:
4
Threads:
1
Joined: Oct 2015
The ECU seems to be EMS2k - 740A04003EWS1 is the software number i get from it.
The last time i read out the file file FFFFFF4 , this file appears to me to have the most data in it , the second read FFFF2 seems to have the most missing .
File was read with genuine Mpps and Data area only but it seems to read the full 512Kb every time.
Is it really normal for the mini ECU to read out this different each time on the same car , smallest difference is around 2000 bytes , largest ( most strange one ) seems to be 12000 bytes , all read from the same car just back to back reading to check that nothing weird is going on
Thanks given by:
Reputation:
51
Thanks Given: 1006
Thanks Received: 395 (241 Posts)
Posts:
1,003
Threads:
204
Joined: Feb 2015
can be checksum variations , too , right?
Thanks given by:
Reputation:
969
Thanks Given: 1438
Thanks Received: 3192 (1559 Posts)
Posts:
4,871
Threads:
42
Joined: May 2015
easiest thing to do is post the files or screen shots of the differences
if you read a file once and then read again straight afterwards (not starting car etc) are those files the same?
good tuning is not free, free tuning is not good
i run garage but file service possible
Stage1/2 EGR DPF Adblue Swirl DTC etc
Thanks given by:
Reputation:
0
Thanks Given: 0
Thanks Received: 0 (0 Posts)
Posts:
4
Threads:
1
Joined: Oct 2015
Yes , ok understood ,
First file the car gave out , the car was started and run after this file was read ,
the last three files the car was not started , only IGN cycled on and off after reading and still we have quite a lot of changes. I will try to make some screen shots of the differences. Smallest differences between the files is just under 2000 Bytes which seems quite a lot to me
Thanks given by:
Reputation:
0
Thanks Given: 0
Thanks Received: 0 (0 Posts)
Posts:
4
Threads:
1
Joined: Oct 2015
7
07-03-2019, 09:51 PM
(This post was last modified: 07-04-2019, 12:00 AM by 888dan.
Edit Reason: updated and solved main issue
)
Ok so after more testing , reading with the kess , it seems to miss the whole first area / 75% of the file so its only looking at the map data only area. If i were to load back on with the kess i would assume it will only write the data only.
With the MPPS , even with data only selected it seems to pull out a lot more with the first portions varying slightly, i am them assuming it maybe only writes the actual map data area when loading up a file. Feels safer using the kess as id rather not load back on a weird varying file even though it may actually be totally safe still. Ok ideal ish
I was hoping to use the MPPS checksum after making changes but possibly paying EVC may be safer ?
* updated , Used a genuine Kess V2 , first portion of the file ignored and map data only write. Checksum with EVC tested and working good , car just needs tuning now ..........
Thanks given by:
Reputation:
318
Thanks Given: 805
Thanks Received: 969 (702 Posts)
Posts:
2,079
Threads:
10
Joined: Nov 2016
if you have kess just use kess. no checksum required.
Developing DSG IMMO/VIN/EEPROM software. PM for details.
Thanks given by: