MHH AUTO
Kt200 2 recommended or not? - Printable Version

+- MHH AUTO (https://mhhauto.com)
+-- Forum: MHH AUTO FORUMS. (https://mhhauto.com/Forum-MHH-AUTO-FORUMS)
+--- Forum: Automotive Hardware. (https://mhhauto.com/Forum-Automotive-Hardware)
+--- Thread: Kt200 2 recommended or not? (/Thread-Kt200-2-recommended-or-not)

Pages: 1 2 3

Kt200 2 recommended or not? - PcvValve - 09-09-2024

Hi,

I have flex and at

But want to have kt200 2 instaed of getting dfox ori.. its very much expensive and high subs..

I want to see they say its advanced more on heavy..

Is that true?

Kt200 2 recommended or not ? Software crashes? Hw quality? Etc.

Thanks

RE: Kt200 2 recommended or not? - JohnTdi - 09-09-2024

"I have flex... but want to have KT200 2"
Its soudns like I have new Ferrari in garage but want to have fiat panda 2003 1.0 LPG too Smile

I have kt200 over year and kt200II since few months. They made around 30 ecu's for me. Most on bench working good, half obd dosnt connect. 1x delco ecu fried (better power supply fix problem) you must have good internet connections. Cable for bench connection very low quality, Software maybe crashed 3-4 times since used.

Compared to price its not bad tool.

Have good day! Smile

RE: Kt200 2 recommended or not? - stevocz - 09-09-2024

you have flex and at and you want kt200? it is joke?

RE: Kt200 2 recommended or not? - PcvValve - 09-09-2024

(09-09-2024, 03:26 PM)stevocz Wrote: you have flex and at and you want kt200? it is joke?

Why it sounds as a joke?

Sure flex and autotuner both master pcmflash ori and many others

I was thinking to get dfox ori but its a bit high with subs..
(09-09-2024, 02:18 PM)JohnTdi Wrote: "I have flex... but want to have KT200 2" 
Its soudns like I have new Ferrari in garage but want to have fiat panda 2003 1.0 LPG too Smile

I have kt200 over year and kt200II since few months. They made around 30 ecu's for me. Most on bench working good, half obd dosnt connect. 1x delco ecu fried (better power supply fix problem)  you must have good internet connections. Cable for bench connection very low quality, Software maybe crashed 3-4 times since used.

Compared to price its not bad tool.

Have good day! Smile

Haha, sure both of them i have master, also pcmflash and many others

In fact i was going to get dfox ori but its a bit high with subs..

RE: Kt200 2 recommended or not? - bRAd - 09-10-2024

then try to check fgtech - full is cheaper than dfox and have cheaper subs too.

RE: Kt200 2 recommended or not? - PcvValve - 09-10-2024

(09-10-2024, 06:32 AM)bRAd Wrote: then try to check fgtech - full is cheaper than dfox and have cheaper subs too.

Already checked but dfox have much more
Protocols...


Even kt200 have more protocols than fgtech ori..


Have u ever bricked any ecu with kt200 2

RE: Kt200 2 recommended or not? - Savrseno - 09-11-2024

Kt200 v2 is very good tool and never failed so far or bricked ecu. Every time i use it with automatic cheksum calculation and all work excellent.
I never use it for edc16 and edc17 bench mode becouse for those ecus pcmflash is tool number 1 for me
New ecus like md1 vag bmw etc working perfect

RE: Kt200 2 recommended or not? - pocoloco - 09-12-2024

i got a few customers working with kt200, it may be just a feeling, but my feeling is that CS correction is wrong pretty much everytime..

RE: Kt200 2 recommended or not? - alegsxr - 09-12-2024

(09-12-2024, 03:40 AM)pocoloco Wrote: i got a few customers working with kt200, it may be just a feeling, but my feeling is that CS correction is wrong pretty much everytime..

with Kt200 2 is possible to read Marelli in system mode?